20250330

The World's Oldest Hatred: Antisemitism as a socio-political strategy throughout history - Robert Spencer

Robert Spencer addresses "Antisemitism:
History & Myth" at David Horowitz
Freedom Center event in L.A.
Robert Spencer discusses his new book about anti-Semitism, exploring its historical roots and manifestations in modern society. He details how anti-Semitic ideologies are linked to conformity pressures across different cultures and religions—including Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Spencer highlights current trends in anti-Semitism and emphasizes the refusal of Jews to conform as a pivotal factor driving such hatred.

Introduction of Robert Spencer

The video opens with an introduction to Robert Spencer, a prolific author with extensive experience in discussing Islamic and anti-Semitic ideologies. He is recognized for his contributions to the dialogue on religious bigotry, particularly through his recent work on anti-Semitism.

Context of Spencer's Book

Spencer's book 'Anti-Semitism: History and Myth' elevates the discussion of contemporary anti-Semitic sentiments following the October 7 attacks. He addresses how longstanding stereotypes resurfaced, compelling him to explore the reasons behind such enduring and evolving hatred.


Understanding Conformism and Anti-Semitism

Spencer posits that a fundamental reason for anti-Semitism lies in conformism, the human tendency to adhere to societal norms. He argues that Jews have historically resisted conformity within larger societies, which has often led to their vilification as outsiders.

Christian Anti-Semitism

The history of Christian anti-Semitism is discussed, emphasizing the theological claims against Jews stemming from the belief that they are responsible for Christ's death. Spencer critiques the contradictions within this belief, showing how it has fueled persecution historically.

Islamic Anti-Semitism

Spencer highlights anti-Semitism within Islamic texts, contending that such rhetoric has deep historical roots that predate modern Western influence. He emphasizes the Quran's references to Jews as enemies and how this shapes contemporary Muslim perspectives on Israel.

National Socialism and Socialism's Role

He discusses National Socialism and its racial ideology, which frames Jews as a dangerous other. Similarly, he points out how socialism, particularly in its international form, has historically targeted Jews in its pursuit of conformity and ideological purity.

Contemporary Anti-Semitism Trends

The video concludes with a warning about the resurgence of anti-Semitic sentiments across various platforms, noting how modern discussions often echo historical prejudices. Spencer calls for a deeper understanding of these patterns to combat their growth. 

Daniel Greenfield, an Editor on FrontPageMag.com and contributor to JihadWatch, offers context of  Robert Spencer's talk near UCLA, where IslamoMarxist students and faculty impeded his appearing last semester.

20250302

Ought Hollywood award recipients exploit the spotlight to dictate their political views?

Vanessa Redgrave redux: In view of the politicized acceptance speech given by directors of "No Other Land," (Oscar for Best Documentary 2025) we republish our article produced on the topic of exploiting the telecast in 2017.



Marlon Brando boycotted the 1973 Oscars to draw attention to Hollywood's depiction of American Indians and Wounded Knee. In 1978, Vanessa Redgrave danced with a PLO Kalashnikov rifle in her anti-Israel documentary, "The Palestinian." In her acceptance speech for her Oscar for "Julia," she made a political statement, calling opponents of her award "Zionist hoodlums" which drew audible disapproval from the audience. 

Meryl Streep exploited her microphone at the 2017 Golden Globe Awards telecast to condemn conservatism, Pres. Trump's vetting of immigrants from troublesome Islamist countries, and to praise multiculturalism.

Should opinion-leader actors and singers exploit the live award-shows' telecast spotlight to preach their politics to a global audience? Is Hollywood's esteemed diversity extended to political views? Would liberals tolerate it from conservatives? Does it needlessly risk alienating half of an artists' fans? Or does virtue-signaling grow an artist's popularity enough to compensate for it?



We took our camera to the red-carpet at Norby Walters' "Night of 100 Stars" 
$1000-per-plate, Oscar viewing-party at the Beverly Hilton to investigate the celebrities' perspectives. How has Hollywood become too political? Do Liberals discriminate professionally against those of alternate views? How much politics (if at all) is it appropriate to foist on an entertainment awards-ceremony TV audience?

We spoke to actors and singers of varying ages and genres: Jon Voight, Richard Lewis,  Ed Asner, Lou Gossett Jr., Richard Grieco, Frankie Valli, Charles Martin-Smith, Tanya Tucker, Trace Adkins, Courtney Stodden, (non-entertainer and anti-Trump operative) Gloria Allred, Wink and Sandy Martindale, Shadoe Stevens, Yakov Smirnfoff,  Tia Carrere, (HBO's Mike Tyson star) Michael Jai White and wife Gillian, Hollywood stylist Daniel DeCriscio. 

In most cases, those who endorsed political speeches were liberals and those opposed it were conservatives. Former Los Angeles County Supervisor Mike Antonovich tied it all together. "(I think) it's not healthy... We want to have everybody enjoy the arts, because the arts are for everyone, regardless of race, color, creed, or political persuasion. ... I'd like to see that restored, once again, as it had been in the past." 

Antonovich agreed there has been some discrimination against non-liberals in Hollywood. "If we're going to support diversity, we need to respect different points of view- and still respect one another and work with one another. ... Respect is what's important."